Prevalence of valvular heart disease in cardiac amyloidosis and impact on survival.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists on the prognostic impact of valvular heart disease in cardiac amyloidosis (CA). We therefore sought to define the prevalence of valvular disease in patients with CA and assess the effects of significant valve disease on survival. METHODS: This multi-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with confirmed transthyretin (TTR) or light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Echocardiographic data closest to the date of amyloid diagnosis was reviewed, and severity was graded according to ASE guidelines. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare survival between patients with moderate or greater valve disease against those with mild or less disease. RESULTS: We included 345 patients (median age 76 years; 73 % men; 110 AL, 235TTR). The median survival for the total patient cohort with cardiac amyloidosis was 2.92 years, with 30 % of patients surviving at five years after their diagnosis. Median survival comparing AL vs ATTR was 2.58 years vs 2.82 years (p = 0.67) The most common valvular abnormalities in the total cohort were mitral (62 %) and tricuspid (66 %).regurgitation There was a statistically significant difference in median survival between patients with no or mild MR compared to those with moderate or severe MR (2.92 years vs 3.35 years, p = 0.0047) (Fig. 5). There was a statistically significant difference in median survival in patients with no or mild TR compared to those with moderate or severe TR (3.35 years vs 2.3 years, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a significant prevalence of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in CA, with patients with moderate to severe MR and TR having a poorer prognosis.

A mouse model of oral contraceptive exposure: Depression, motivation, and the stress response.

Hormonal contraceptives, including oral contraceptives (OCs), regulate hormonal cycles and broadly affect physiological processes, including stress responsivity. Whereas many users describe overall improved mood, up to 10 % of OC users experience adverse effects, including depression and anxiety. Given the link between regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, stress exposure, and risk for depression, it is likely that OC-effects on stress mediate increased risk or increased resilience to these disorders. In this study, we developed and characterized a tractable mouse model of OC exposure with which to identify the mechanisms underlying OC modulation of brain, behavior, and mood. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether translationally relevant doses of OC-hormones in mice mimic changes in stress responsivity observed in humans taking OCs and describe behavioral changes during OC exposure. Young adult female C57Bl/6 N mice received daily ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LVNG) in 10 % sucrose, EE and drospirenone (DRSP) in 10 % sucrose, or 10 % sucrose alone. Translationally relevant doses of EE + LVNG-exposure, but not EE + DRSP, suppressed the acute stress response, consistent with effects observed in human OC users. EE + LVNG caused a specific anhedonia-like effect, without broad changes in stress-coping behavior, other depression-like behaviors, or anxiety-like behaviors. The suppression of regular estrous cycling, together with the blunting of the corticosterone response to acute stress, demonstrate the utility of this model for future studies to identify the mechanisms underlying OC interactions with stress, motivation, and risk for depression.

Personalized Postacute Hospitalization Recovery: A Novel Intervention to Improve Patient Experience and Reduce Cost.

GOAL: Readmissions are a significant financial burden for payers. Cardiovascular-related discharges are particularly prone to readmission. Posthospital discharge support can impact patient recovery and probably reduce patient readmissions. This study aimed to address the underlying behavioral and psychosocial factors that can negatively affect patients after discharge. METHODS: The study population was adult patients admitted to the hospital with a cardiovascular diagnosis who had a plan to discharge home. Those who consented to participate were randomized to intervention or control groups on a 1:1 basis. The intervention group received behavioral and emotional support, whereas the control group received usual care. Interventions included motivational interviewing, patient activation, empathetic communication, addressing mental health and substance use, and mindfulness. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Observed total readmission costs were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group ($1.1 million vs. $2.0 million) as was the observed mean cost per readmitted patient ($44,052 vs. $91,278). The mean expected cost of readmission after adjustment for confounding variables was lower in the intervention group than in the control group ($8,094 vs. $9,882, p = .011). PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Readmissions are a costly spend category. In this study, posthospital discharge support addressing the psychosocial factors contributing to patients' readmissions resulted in a lower total cost of care for those with a cardiovascular diagnosis. We describe an intervention that is reproducible and can be scaled broadly through technology to reduce readmission costs.

Impact of Tafamidis on Survival in a Real-World Community-Based Cohort.

Tafamidis is the only therapy shown to improve survival in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) based on randomized controlled trial data. We sought to evaluate the impact of tafamidis on survival in a real-world community-based cohort. This was a prospective observational cohort study that included consecutive patients with confirmed ATTR based on biopsy or TcPYP imaging. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients taking tafamidis vs not, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare survival between these groups. We examined the reasons that ATTR patients were not on tafamidis. Of 107 ATTR patients, median age was 83.9 years, 79% were men, and 63 (59%) of them were on tafamidis. Demographics and baseline cardiovascular risk factors did not differ significantly between those on vs off tafamidis, although there was a higher proportion of NYHA Class III or IV heart failure in those off tafamidis (76% vs 57%, P < 0.01). The most common reasons patients were not on tafamidis included delays in obtaining the drug or financial barriers (59%) and NYHA Class IV heart failure (19.5%). Patients taking tafamidis had a significantly higher median survival compared to those not on tafamidis (median survival 6.70 vs 1.43 years, P < 0.0001). Our study demonstrates significantly improved survival in ATTR patients taking tafamidis. Barriers exist to tafamidis initiation including delayed access and affordability, and efforts should be made to improve patient access.

Prognostic Value of Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Models in Patients with Severe COVID-19.

Introduction Severe novel corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes dysregulation of the coagulation system with arterial and venous thromboembolism (VTE). We hypothesize that validated VTE risk scores would have prognostic ability in this population. Methods Retrospective observational cohort with severe COVID-19 performed in NorthShore University Health System. Patients were >18 years of age and met criteria for inpatient or intensive care unit (ICU) care. The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) and Caprini scores were calculated and patients were stratified. Results This study includes 184 patients, mostly men (63.6%), Caucasian (54.3%), 63 years old (interquartile range [IQR]: 24-101), and 57.1% of them required ICU care. Twenty-seven (14.7%) thrombotic events occurred: 12 (6.5%) cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), 9 (4.9%) of pulmonary embolism, 5 (2.7%) of deep vein thrombosis, and 1 (0.5%) stroke. Among them, 86 patients (46.7%) died, 95 (51.6%) were discharged, and 3 (1.6%) were still hospitalized. "Moderate risk for VTE" and "High risk for VTE" by IMPROVE score had significant mortality association: (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.93-11.03; p < 0.001) and (HR = 6.22; 95% CI: 3.04-12.71; p < 0.001), respectively, with 87% sensitivity and 63% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.752, p < 0.001). "High Risk for VTE" by Caprini score had significant mortality association (HR = 17.6; 95% CI: 5.56-55.96; p < 0.001) with 96% sensitivity and 55% specificity (AUC = 0.843, p < 0.001). Both scores were associated with thrombotic events when classified as "High risk for VTE" by IMPROVE (HR = 6.50; 95% CI: 2.72-15.53; p < 0.001) and Caprini scores (HR = 11.507; 95% CI: 2.697-49.104; p = 0.001). Conclusion The IMPROVE and Caprini risk scores were independent predictors of mortality and thrombotic events in severe COVID-19. With larger validation, this can be useful prognostic information.